Every listing shows a real preview and a real example output before you pay. Prompts are written by the people who use them, starting with a small set from us to get the shelves stocked.
27 prompts
All seven school counseling prompts in one purchase, plus a routing prompt that tells you which one to reach for and in what order.
All five grant research prompts covering the full cycle, plus a cycle-planning prompt that sequences them against a real submission deadline.
A four-stage chain that turns scattered intervention records into a referral-packet narrative: a cycle-by-cycle inventory, a gap audit written the way a reviewer reads, the chronological narrative, and the questions the team should expect.
A four-stage chain for the meeting where a school team reviews intervention data: a flagged pre-read built from raw numbers, a time-boxed agenda, a decision record with owners and dates, and the collection plan for the next cycle.
Builds a complete Tier 2 SEL small-group arc: session plans, ASCA-aligned objectives, progress monitoring, and the results report that justifies the group.
Builds a funder final report in four stages that reports honestly against the objectives you actually promised, including the ones you missed, without losing the renewal.
A four-stage coaching sequence that gets a student to a stronger personal statement in their own voice by asking questions and giving feedback. It never writes their prose.
Assembles completed FBA data into a draft behavior intervention plan: hypothesized function, a replacement behavior that beats the target behavior on effort, strategies that trace to the function, and a monitoring and fidelity plan.
Drafts a one- to two-page letter of inquiry that fits a specific funder's stated interests and survives the thirty-second skim that decides whether you get invited to apply.
Writes tier entry, response, and exit criteria for a building: each one names its data source, threshold, points required, and who applies it, sized to the seats that actually exist, with a check on who the thresholds would have flagged last year.
Builds a funder-ready logic model and theory of change narrative from the program you actually run, with an indicator and a real data source behind every outcome row.
Organizes what you already did during a crisis response into clean, defensible documentation. It performs no risk assessment and makes no clinical judgment.
Produces a prioritized funder prospect brief for your mission and service area, with an approach strategy for each tier and every unverifiable figure marked for checking.
Writes the budget narrative that justifies every line in your budget, handles indirect cost rate and cost share correctly, and flags the lines a reviewer will question.
Turns a student's data into a defensible Tier 2 intervention match: the concern in observable terms, the recommendation with reasoning, the options ruled out, entry criteria, and a monitoring cadence with decision rules.
Builds the measurement half of an intervention cycle: observable target, confirmed baseline, a goal with its implied weekly rate, the measure and who collects it, decision rules for continue, intensify, change, and exit, plus a fidelity check.
Builds an attendance intervention from the actual pattern: what the data shows by day and period, ranked barriers with a confidence level, one matched action per barrier with an owner, a family contact plan, and supports ahead of consequences.
Builds a needs statement that argues from data at three levels (community, population, and your specific service gap) without a single unverifiable statistic slipping through.
Designs a check-in check-out cycle end to end: the function fit test, a point card tied to your schoolwide expectations, the daily scripts, the fidelity checklist, and the fading plan that gets the student off it.
Turns a brag sheet plus what you actually know about a student into a traceable draft letter, with an evidence map first and every unsupported claim flagged instead of invented.
Turns your raw IEP or 504 meeting notes into a plain-language family summary that mirrors the team's actual decisions without inventing any.
Builds a facilitator guide for a restorative or peer-mediation conversation, including the pre-meetings, the actual script, and the conditions under which you should not hold it.
Writes a short family update about an intervention: what it is, what the data shows, what happens next, and what the family can ask for, plus a sender-only block on what was left out and which lines will draw questions.
Turns a student profile into a prioritized scholarship search brief with realistic effort-to-award ratios and a deadline-ordered action plan.
Rewrites the reply you want to send into one you can actually send: warm, factual, boundaried, and free of the phrases that escalate a parent complaint.
Turns your scribbled between-bells check-in notes into a clean, de-identified contact log with MTSS tier tagging and an ASCA use-of-time summary.
Screens a funding opportunity against your organization in about ten minutes and returns a defensible go, no-go, or go-if decision with the reasoning written down.